Skip to content
Free tool · runs in your browser · no sign-up

A/B test calculator

Two sponsor creatives, two subject lines, two buttons — one got more clicks. Put in the numbers and find out whether that gap is real or just noise, and how much longer an undecided test needs.

Examples
Variant A
Variant B

“Impressions” is whatever each variant was shown to — opens for an in-email creative, sends for a subject line. Use the same measure for both.

No winner yet

No clear winner. The gap between “Creative A” and “Creative B” is within what chance alone would produce (p = 0.27).

If the true difference is as big as it looks now, you’d need about 12,743 impressions per variant to detect it reliably — 10,743 more than the smaller arm has so far. If the real gap is smaller than it looks, you’ll need more.

Click rate with 95% interval

Creative A4.50% (3.68% – 5.50%)
Creative B3.80% (3.05% – 4.73%)

Overlapping bars don’t settle it on their own — the test below compares the two directly.

Difference
+0.70 pts
95%: −0.54 pts to +1.95 pts
Relative lift
+18.4%
Creative A vs Creative B
p-value
0.267
not below 0.05
Per variant
2,000
smaller arm · 1,000 needed for a verdict

How it decides

  • No rate under 200 impressions. Below that, a click rate is mostly noise, so it isn’t shown at all.
  • No winner under 1,000 per variant, however big the gap looks.
  • Then a two-proportion z-test. A winner is named only when p is below 0.05 — when a gap this size would turn up less than one time in twenty if the two were really the same.
  • Decide your sample size first. Checking repeatedly and stopping the moment it looks significant finds “winners” that aren’t.

Same thresholds and the same two-proportion test as Carrier Crow’s sponsorship report.

Read the guide

Is your sponsor's A/B test result real?

Why 4.1% against 3.8% on a few hundred impressions is noise, and how to tell a real difference between two sponsor creatives from luck.